New York Times holds course in 'brutal' conditions


June 18, 2010 Updated Apr 23, 2009 at 2:11 PM EDT

* New York Times Co to stay public, independent

* Investors re-elect company directors

* Shares unchanged at $4.94

By Robert MacMillan

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The New York Times Co
will remain publicly traded, build its online business
and cut costs despite "brutal" conditions that threaten the
survival of newspapers, Chairman Arthur Sulzberger Jr said at
the publisher's annual meeting on Thursday.

Sulzberger expressed his confidence about the future of the
Times Co, while acknowledging that big problems stand in the
way of improving its business.

The financial crisis and recession have had "brutal effects
on all of us in the media business," Sulzberger told investors
from a podium in an auditorium at its headquarters in New York
City, his top executives seated nearby with grim faces.

"The New York Times Company is no exception," he said.
"Business will continue to be difficult."

The meeting did not produce any radical changes in course,
nor did it produce fireworks among shareholders, even as
pressure grows on Sulzberger to find a way to fix the business,
and experts wonder how long the Times Co can survive.

The Times on Monday marked a journalistic triumph of
winning five Pulitzer Prizes, then reported a quarterly loss on
a 27 percent decline in advertising revenue the next day.

Sulzberger thanked his family, which has controlled the
Times since 1896, for remaining committed to the Times despite
the board's decision to kill its dividend to pay off debt.

He did not reiterate his declaration from last year that
the Times is not for sale, which many media observers have
speculated could happen if children in the Ochs-Sulzberger
family were alarmed by their dwindling fortunes.

His cousin, Times Co Vice Chairman Michael Golden, said
that the Times still is not for sale. "I wouldn't read anything
into that," he told Reuters, after being asked why Sulzberger
did not repeat what he said last year.

Investors and media outlets searching for answers on the
future of the Times and its Boston Globe, which it has
threatened to shut down if it cannot get concessions from its
union, heard nothing new.

Sulzberger and Chief Executive Janet Robinson declined to
say what they will do with the Globe, though Sulzberger said
the company "cares deeply" about the paper, which it bought for
$1.1 billion in 1993.

They stuck mostly to highlighting cost-cut plans and ways
to increase online revenue that they have shared before. The
company has laid off employees, lowered pay by up to 5 percent,
restructured its benefit plans, closed divisions, sold its
share in its headquarters building and borrowed money from
Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim to help right itself.

Slim, who through his businesses has lent the Times Co $250
million in exchange for a nearly 17 percent stake in the
company, almost as large as the Ochs-Sulzberger's, has not
offered candidates of his own for the board, Sulzberger said.

Another shareholder, Harbinger Capital Partners, avoided a
proxy battle with the Times in 2008 by getting the Times to
allow to of its nominees onto the board.


Sulzberger said there is no single way to solve the
problems that ail U.S. newspapers, which are fighting to
survive plunging ad revenue and in some cases, deepening losses
and mountains of debt.

He said the company is examining afresh whether it can make
people pay -- through subscriptions or per-article payments --
for the news that they read online.

He said the company has not yet decided whether to charge a
fee, something it has tried twice before. He also said that the
Web's ascendance does not spell the end of printed papers.

Most people now read news for free online, prompting one
investor at the meeting to wonder aloud why the Times keeps
raising prices for its print subscribers.

Times Co investors in the company's publicly traded shares
voted to re-elect five members of the company's 15-member board
of directors on Thursday. Members of the Ochs-Sulzberger
family, who control the company through a different class of
shares, voted to re-elect the rest.

Though investors did not withhold votes in large numbers as
in recent years, some criticized the executives' performance.

Times shares were unchanged at $4.94 on the New York Stock
Exchange early Thursday afternoon. The stock has lost 75
percent of its value in the past 12 months and is down some 90
percent from highs of more than $50 earlier in the decade.

(Reporting by Robert MacMillan; Editing by Richard Chang)

What are your thoughts CLICK HERE to leave us a "QUESTION OF THE DAY” comment.

© Copyright 2016, A Quincy Media broadcasting station. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To submit a comment on this article, your email address is required. We respect your privacy and your email will not be visible to others nor will it be added to any email lists.